The House passed a nearly $70 billion package Tuesday to fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol for three years, capping off a four-month partisan standoff.

That bill is now on its way to President Donald Trump’s desk following a 214-212 vote, proving Republicans can ignore Democratic demands to crack down on the administration’s immigration policies and still pump unprecedented funding to the agencies carrying them out.

Following the collapse of negotiations to restrict the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement tactics, Republicans harnessed the party-line budget reconciliation process to pass legislation funding ICE and Border Patrol without any Democratic votes. Those faltered talks began after immigration agents fatally shot two U.S. citizens in Minnesota in January.

The end result is the enactment of supercharged budgets for both agencies — and the guarantee that they will be funded beyond the end of Trump’s presidency.

“Hallelujah — they can’t shut them down now,” Rep. Greg Steube (R-Fla.) said in an interview Tuesday, referring to Democrats.

On top of the more than $140 billion Republicans gave ICE and Border Patrol as part of last summer’s tax and spending megabill, the legislation cleared Tuesday will pile on about $65 billion more — plus another $5 billion for Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin to dole out at his discretion.

The annual budgets for those two agencies total about $17 billion combined under the regular government funding process.

“We are asking ICE to not cause chaos and decrease public safety in our neighborhoods. They already got a huge lump sum of money,” Rep. Grace Meng (D-N.Y.), a senior House appropriator, said in an interview. “So I think it's more than fair that we ask for reforms before we give them another penny.”

The monthslong ordeal to fully fund DHS after a 76-day lapse ran adjacent to a major personnel shakeup, with the March ouster of then-Secretary Kristi Noem and subsequent installation of Mullin.

The new secretary told lawmakers this month that DHS agents are now seeking judicial warrants to enter private residences, unless agents are already in the midst of pursuing an individual who then enters a home. Mullin also said that, starting in July, DHS will begin requiring 72 days of training for new immigration officers rather than the 42-day accelerated program the Trump administration has been using.

But Mullin refused to commit to following court orders and dismissed allegations of inhumane treatment at immigration detention centers, after shutting down the independent DHS watchdog last month tasked with investigating abuses at immigrant holding facilities.

He also accused Democrats of hampering months of bipartisan talks around new immigration enforcement policies to save face with liberal voters ahead of the midterm elections.

“You would never get to ‘yes,’ and so we walked away and did reconciliation,” Mullin told Democratic appropriators during a hearing this month.

Defending his party’s posture, Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said in an interview this week that DHS has “refused to rein in a lawless ICE operation” and noted that he publicly pressed Mullin on why DHS has not been cooperating with local authorities investigating the killings in Minnesota.

Despite what is ostensibly a victory Tuesday for the GOP, not every Republican sees it that way. House Republicans initially revolted against the plan, which originated in the Senate, to clear funding for ICE and Border Patrol through the party-line process while separately joining with Democrats to pass a bill to fund the rest of DHS.

One of those House skeptics said Tuesday that the months of work it took to fund the immigration agencies is testament to the foolhardiness of the plan Senate Republicans embraced.

“The deal in the beginning to split out ICE and Border Patrol should have never happened,” Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) said in an interview. “I knew it when it happened, and this proved it.”

To win enough GOP support for the gambit, House Republican leaders had to convince many of their members that they will get a chance to pass a third party-line package later this year. There’s no consensus GOP agenda for that bill, but groups of Republicans are counting on it to cut taxes, bolster military funding, crack down on fraud in safety net programs and boost programs that bring down costs for Americans ahead of the midterms.

But many Republicans doubt GOP leaders will be able to pull off enactment of another reconciliation package in the coming months, considering the House is only scheduled to be in session for nine weeks before Election Day and Speaker Mike Johnson is increasingly struggling to whip enough support for major legislation with a narrow majority.

Johnson had to make another deal with conservative hard-liners on Tuesday, when he promised a floor vote on legislation codifying Trump's border policies in order to muscle through a procedural vote on the immigration enforcement package, according to three people with knowledge of the conversations.

Johnson promised the holdouts the vote would take place before July 4 — which is just 11 legislative days away.

Meredith Lee Hill contributed to this report.